It seems that it’s very important to you to be right, but this is not about being right or wrong, it’s about facts. The real life testing such as playing game is much more reliable. Otherwise, M2 Max's video that you mentioned is not a proof.Īnd benchmark doesn't really prove anything. If you wanna prove me wrong, bring me a video of M2 Max testing outdoor location of RE8 or exactly identical location of M1 Max's testing which right after the early stage where Ethen Winter is heading to the village. Created Tech's video compared exactly at the same outdoor location to compare each other which is more reliable testing. That's how he got higher FPS which is meaningless. It's much easier to get higher FPS since there aren't many objects to render compared to outside. He shot his video while he is playing INSIDE the castle or house. Dont say the power consumption is much lower, the gamers only care about the performance.Īlso, M2 Max's performance from Andru Edward's video is totally MISLEADING and not comparable. As a result, the gaming performance is still bad compared to Nvidia. Nvidia has RTX 40 series which is based on TSMC 5nm, not 5nm+ or 4nm. Might be close to mobile RTX 3070ti but guess what? It's not even 5nm+ based. M1 Max was not even close to Mobile RTX 3070ti instead of mobile RTX 3060. Do you really think adding 2 more GPU cores with different GPU architecture improve the GPU performance dramatically? I highly doubt it. The video I attached shows that M1 Max at 2K or 1440P usually stays around 60~70 FPS while mobile RTX 3070ti stays around 120 FPS.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |